Home Dialysis Study compares clinical outcomes of Ellipsys and WavelinQ-4F pAVF devices

Study compares clinical outcomes of Ellipsys and WavelinQ-4F pAVF devices

Credits to the Source Link Obum
Modified dialysis device treats COVID-19

Two devices for creating minimally invasive dialysis access–the Ellipsys® Vascular Access System and the WavelinQ™ 4F System–demonstrated high rates of technical success and low rates of complications, according to a new study published in the Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. In addition, both technologies enabled patients to start dialysis sooner compared to surgery, offering significant quality-of-life benefits.

For patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who require hemodialysis, the preferred type of vascular access is an arteriovenous fistula (AVF)–a permanent connection between a vein and artery in the arm. Until recently, the only way to create an AVF was through a surgical procedure that subjects patients to discomfort, longer recovery times and delayed dialysis.

Both the Ellipsys and WavelinQ devices offer a nonsurgical alternative by using a minimally invasive approach to create a percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF). The new single-center study, led by vascular surgeon Robert Shahverdyan, MD, (Vascular Access Center, Hamburg, Germany), compared the outcomes for 100 patients who underwent pAVF procedures (65 Ellipsys and 35 WavelinQ) from December 2017 to December 2019.

The Ellipsys System had a technical success rate of 100 percent, and only 27.7 percent of patients required secondary interventions following fistula creation. The WavelinQ system demonstrated similar outcomes, with a technical success rate of 97 percent and 26.5 percent of patients requiring secondary interventions. Overall, 79.5 percent of Ellipsys patients and 58 percent of WavelinQ patients were able to successfully begin dialysis with their fistula. At 12 months, 82 percent of Ellipsys fistulas were still functional, compared to 60 percent of WavelinQ fistulas.

“For every patient, my goal is to create the best possible dialysis access with the fewest possible interventions,” said Dr. Shahverdyan. “Our data show that with careful planning, both systems can safely and quickly create percutaneous fistulas with a high rate of success, though the Ellipsys System appears to create more durable access that is also easier to repair if that becomes necessary.”

Compared to surgical fistulas, both devices reduced the time to dialysis (cannulation). The mean time to cannulation for WavelinQ was 90 days, compared to 60 days with Ellipsys. In fact, 75 percent of Ellipsys fistulas were ready for cannulation at just 4 weeks, with a small number of patients ready for early cannulation within a few days of fistula creation, Dr. Shahverdyan notes.

This study confirms other newly published data showing how much faster we can start using the Ellipsys percutaneous fistula for dialysis–a finding that has significant patient safety benefits. The sooner a patient can start dialysis with their fistula, the sooner we can get them off such riskier dialysis access methods as central venous catheters, which are associated with much higher rates of infection and other complications.”

Jeffrey Hull, MD, Interventional Radiologist, Richmond Vascular Center, Richmond, Va

Dr. Hull is the lead author on a recent study of Ellipsys pAVF that reported an average time to dialysis of 66 days. Vascular surgeon Alexandros Mallios, MD, recently published data showing that patients were able to begin using their pAVF for dialysis an average of 4 weeks after creation, with six percent of fistulas becoming functional in as little as 2 weeks.

The studied technologies differ significantly in their design, pAVF creation technique and fistula location. The single-catheter Ellipsys system uses ultrasound guidance and thermal energy to create the fused and permanent connection between the perforating vein and the proximal radial artery; no radiation or contrast media are required. The WavelinQ device is a two-catheter system that uses radio-frequency energy and fluoroscopy to create an aligned slit fistula. Differences between the systems can affect patient eligibility for the procedures based on anatomic constraints.

“Based on our preoperative ultrasound evaluations, we found that 65 percent of patients were eligible for an Ellipsys pAVF, compared to just 27 percent with the WavelinQ system,” said Dr. Shahverdyan. “By knowing that more than twice as many patients will be able to undergo the procedure, Ellipsys makes it more feasible for a center to offer this endovascular approach to creating dialysis access.”

Cleared by the FDA in 2018 for patients with end-stage renal disease, Ellipsys is the first significant innovation in AVF creation in over 50 years. It transforms a complex surgery into a minimally invasive procedure that can be performed in a hospital outpatient setting, ambulatory surgery center or physician’s office. Since 2015, nearly 3,000 patients worldwide have undergone the Ellipsys procedure. Recently published long-term data show that 92 percent of Ellipsys fistulas are still functional after 2 years. The study also found high levels of patient satisfaction with the procedure.

Source:

Journal reference:

Shahverdyan, R., et al. (2020) Comparison of Outcomes of Percutaneous Arteriovenous Fistulae Creation by Ellipsys and WavelinQ Devices. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2020.06.008.

Source Link

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We will assume you are ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

%d bloggers like this: